Rule 251.23.Disability Inactive Status
(a)Disability Inactive Status.
Where it is shown that
an attorney is unable to fulfill professional responsibilities
competently because of physical, mental or emotional infirmity
or illness, including addiction to drugs or intoxicants, the
attorney shall be transferred to disability inactive status.
During such time as an attorney is on disability inactive
status the attorney shall not engage in the practice of law.
Proceedings instituted against an attorney pursuant to
this Rule are disability proceedings. Transfer to disability
inactive status is not a form of discipline and does not
involve a violation of the attorney's oath. The pendency of
proceedings provided for by this Rule shall not defer or abate
other proceedings conducted pursuant to these Rules, unless
after a hearing the Presiding Disciplinary Judge determines
that the attorney, is unable to assist in the defense of those
other proceedings because of the disability. If such other
proceedings are deferred, then the deferral shall continue
until such time as the attorney is found to be eligible for
reinstatement as provided by C.R.C.P. 251.30.
(b)Transfer to Disability Inactive Status Without a Hearing.
Where an attorney who is subject to these Rules has
been judicially declared mentally ill, or has been
involuntarily committed to a mental hospital, or has
voluntarily petitioned for the appointment of a guardian, or
has been found not guilty by reason of insanity in a criminal
proceeding in a court of record, the Presiding Disciplinary
Judge, upon proper proof of the fact, shall enter an order
transferring the attorney to disability inactive status. Such
order shall remain in effect unless altered by the Presiding
Disciplinary Judge or the Supreme Court. A copy of the order transferring
an attorney to disability inactive status shall be served upon the attorney
and upon either the attorney's guardian or the superintendent
of the hospital in which the attorney is confined. Service
shall be made in such manner as the Presiding Disciplinary
Judge may direct.
(c)Procedure When Disability is Alleged.
Whenever any interested party shall petition the Presiding Disciplinary
Judge to determine whether an attorney is incapable of
continuing to practice law by reason of physical, mental or
emotional infirmity or illness, including addiction to drugs
or intoxicants, or whether the attorney in a proceeding
conducted pursuant to these Rules is so incapacitated as to be
unable to proffer a defense, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge
shall direct such action as it deems necessary or proper to
determine whether the attorney is incapacitated, including an
examination of the attorney by qualified medical experts
designated by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge; provided,
however, that before any medical examination or other action
may be ordered, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge must afford
the attorney an opportunity to show cause why such examination
or action should not be ordered. If, upon due consideration of
the matter, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge determines that
the attorney is incapable of continuing to practice law or is
incapable of defending in proceedings conducted pursuant to
these Rules, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge shall enter an
order transferring the attorney to disability inactive status.
Such order shall remain in effect unless altered by the
Presiding Disciplinary Judge or the Supreme Court.
An attorney against whom disability proceedings are
pending shall be given notice of such proceedings. Notice
shall be given in such a manner as the Presiding Disciplinary
Judge may direct. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge may appoint
counsel to represent the attorney if the attorney is without
adequate representation.
(d)Procedure When Attorney During Course of Proceedings
Alleges a Disability that Impairs the Attorney's Ability to Defend Himself.
If in the course of proceedings conducted
pursuant to these Rules the lawyer alleges disability by
reason of physical, mental or emotional infirmity or illness,
including addiction to drugs or intoxicants, that impairs the
attorney's ability to defend adequately in such
proceedings, such proceedings shall be suspended and the
Presiding Disciplinary Judge shall enter an order transferring
the attorney to disability inactive status and order a medical
examination of the attorney. Upon review of the report of the
medical examination and other relevant information, the
Presiding Disciplinary Judge may do any of the following:
(1)Order a hearing on the issue of whether the attorney
suffers from a disability that impairs the attorney's
ability to defend adequately in such other proceedings;
(2)Continue the order transferring the lawyer to
disability inactive status;
(3)Discharge the order transferring the lawyer to
disability inactive status, and order that the proceedings
pending against the attorney be resumed;
(4)Enter any other appropriate order, including an order
directing further examination of the attorney.
(e)Burden of Proof.
In a disability proceeding seeking
the transfer of an attorney to disability inactive status the
party petitioning for transfer shall bear the burden of proof
by clear and convincing evidence.
(f)Hearings.
Any hearings held pursuant to this Rule
shall be conducted by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge in the
manner prescribed by C.R.C.P. 251.18 and C.R.C.P. 251.19, and
a Hearing Board shall not be required.
(g)Compensation.
The Presiding Disciplinary Judge may
fix the compensation to be paid to any legal counsel or
medical expert appointed by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge
pursuant to this Rule. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge may
direct that such compensation be assessed as part of the costs
of a proceeding held pursuant to this Rule and that it be paid
as such in accordance with law.
(h)Post-Hearing Relief and Notice of Appeal.
The attorney may file a motion for post-hearing relief or a notice
of appeal as provided in C.R.C.P. 251.19.
|
ANNOTATIONSSource:
Amended and adopted June 25, 1998, effective January 1, 1999;
entire rule amended and effective September 1, 2000.
Editor's note:
This rule was previously numbered as
241.19.
Annotator's note.
The following annotations include cases decided under former
provisions similar to this rule.
Former section (a) is not unconstitutional. Requiring attorney to
prove
mental illness by clear and convincing evidence was not contrary to Section
13-25-127 (1), which establishes a preponderance of the evidence as the
quantum of proof in civil cases, because an attorney disciplinary proceeding
is not strictly a civil proceeding. People v. Sullivan, 802 P.2d 1091 (Colo.
1990).
Applied in People v. Luxford, 626 P.2d 675 (Colo. 1981);
People v. Southern, 638 P.2d 787 (Colo. 1982);
People v. Barbour, 639 P.2d 1065 (Colo. 1982);
People v. Dwyer, 652 P.2d 1074 (Colo. 1982);
People v. Craig, 708 P.2d 787 (Colo. 1985).
|