Rule 7.3.Direct Contact with Prospective Clients
                                                                
Rule 7.3.Direct Contact with Prospective Clients 
 (a)A lawyer shall not either in-person or by live telephone contact, 
 solicit professional employment from a prospective client with whom the 
 lawyer 
 has no family or prior professional relationship where a significant motive 
 for the lawyer's doing so is the lawyer's pecuniary gain. 
  
 (b)A lawyer shall not solicit professional employment from a 
 prospective client by written, recorded or electronic communication or by 
 in-person or telephone contact even when not otherwise prohibited by 
 paragraph (a), if: 
  
 (1)the prospective client has made known to the lawyer a desire not to be 
 solicited by the lawyer; or 
  
 (2)the solicitation involves coercion, duress or harassment. 
  
 (c)A lawyer shall not solicit professional employment from a 
 prospective client believed to be in need of legal services which arise out of 
 the personal injury or death of any person by written, recorded, or electronic 
 communication.  This provision shall not apply if the lawyer has a family or 
 prior professional relationship with the prospective client, or if the 
 communication is issued more than 30 days after the occurrence of the event for which the legal representation is being solicited.  Any such 
 communication must comply with Rule 7.1, Rule 7.2 and the following: 
  
 (1)No such communication may be made if the lawyer knows or reasonably 
 should know that the person to whom the communication is directed is represented by a lawyer in the matter. 
  
 (2)If a lawyer other than the lawyer whose name or signature is 
 contained in the communication will actually handle the case or matter, or if 
 the case or matter will be referred to another lawyer or law firm, any such communication shall include a statement so advising the prospective 
 client. 
  
 (3)No such communication shall be made to resemble legal pleadings or other legal documents. 
  
 (4)Any such written or recorded communication shall not reveal on the 
 envelope or on the outside of a self-mailing brochure or pamphlet the nature of the prospective client's legal problem. 
  
 (5)A copy of or recording of such communication and a sample of the 
 envelopes in which the communications are enclosed shall be kept for a period 
 of four years from the date of dissemination of the communication. 
  
 (d)Every written, recorded or electronic communication governed by 
 this Rule 7.3 shall include the words "this is an advertisement" in a form 
 that 
 is clear and conspicuous on the outside of the envelope, if any, and at the 
 beginning and end of any written, recorded or electronic communication. 
  
 COMMENT 
 There is a potential for abuse inherent in direct in-person or live 
 telephone contact by a lawyer with a prospective client known to need legal 
 services.  These forms of contact between a lawyer and a prospective client 
 subject the layperson to the private importuning of the trained advocate in a 
 direct interpersonal encounter.  The prospective client, who may already feel 
 overwhelmed by the circumstances giving rise to the need for legal services, 
 may find it difficult fully to evaluate all available alternatives with 
 reasoned judgment and appropriate self-interest in the face of the lawyer's 
 presence and insistence upon being retained immediately.  The situation is 
 fraught with the possibility of undue influence, intimidation, and 
 over-reaching. 
  
 This potential for abuse inherent in direct in-person or live telephone 
 solicitation of prospective clients justifies its prohibition, particularly 
 since lawyer advertising and written and recorded communication permitted 
 under 
 Rule 7.2 offer alternative means of conveying necessary information to those 
 who may be in need of legal services.  Advertising and written and recorded 
 communications which may be mailed or auto dialed make it possible for a 
 prospective client to be informed about the need for legal services, and 
 about the qualifications of available lawyers and law firms, without 
 subjecting the prospective client to direct in-person 
 or telephone persuasion that may overwhelm the client's judgment. 
  
 The use of general advertising and written and recorded communications to 
 transmit information from lawyer to prospective client, rather than direct 
 in-person or live telephone contact, will help to assure that the 
 information flows cleanly as well as freely.  The contents of advertisements 
 and communications permitted under Rule 7.2 are permanently recorded so that 
 they cannot be disputed and may be shared with others who know the lawyer. 
 This potential for informal review is itself likely to help guard against 
 statements and claims that might constitute false and misleading 
 communications, in violation of Rule 7.1.  The contents of direct in-person 
 or 
 live telephone conversations between a lawyer to a prospective client can be 
 disputed and are not subject to third-party scrutiny.  Consequently, 
 they are much more likely to approach (and occasionally cross) 
 the dividing line between accurate representations and those that are false 
 and misleading. 
  
 There is far less likelihood that a lawyer would engage in abusive 
 practices 
 against an individual with whom the lawyer has a prior personal or 
 professional 
 relationship or where the lawyer is motivated by considerations other than 
 the 
 lawyer's pecuniary gain. Consequently, the general prohibition in Rule 7.3(a) 
 and the requirements of Rule 7.3(c) are not applicable in those 
 situations. 
  
 But even permitted forms of solicitation can be abused.  Thus, any 
 solicitation which contains information which is false or misleading within the 
 meaning of Rule 7.1, which involves coercion, duress or harassment within the 
 meaning of Rule 7.3(b)(2), or which involves contact with a prospective client 
 who has made known to the lawyer a desire not to be solicited by the lawyer 
 within the meaning of Rule 7.3(b)(1) is prohibited.  Moreover, if after sending 
 a letter or other communication to a client as permitted by Rule 7.2 the lawyer receives no response, any further effort to communicate with the 
 prospective client may violate the provisions of Rule 7.3(b). 
  
 This Rule is not intended to prohibit a lawyer from contacting 
 representatives of organizations or groups that may be interested in 
 establishing a group or prepaid legal plan for their members, insured, 
 beneficiaries or other third parties for the purpose of informing such 
 entities 
 of the availability of and details concerning the plan or arrangement which 
 the 
 lawyer or lawyer's firm is willing to offer.  This form of communication is 
 not 
 directed to a prospective client.  Rather, it is usually addressed to an 
 individual acting in a fiduciary capacity seeking a supplier of legal 
 services 
 for others who may, if they choose, become prospective clients of the lawyer. 
 Under these circumstances, the activity which the lawyer undertakes in 
 communicating with such representatives and the type of information 
 transmitted to the individual are functionally similar to and serve the same 
 purpose as advertising permitted under Rule 7.2. 
  
 The requirement that certain communications be marked 
 "This Is An Advertisement" does not apply to communications sent in response 
 to 
 requests of potential clients or their spokespersons or sponsors.  General 
 announcements by lawyers, including changes in personnel or office location, 
 do 
 not constitute communications soliciting professional employment from a 
 client known to be in need of legal services within the meaning of this Rule. 
  
 
                                                                
ANNOTATIONS
Source: Entire rule and comment amended and adopted and committee comment deleted by amendment June 12, 1997, effective January 1, 1998. ANNOTATION Annotator's note. Rule 7.3 is similar to DR 2-101, DR 2-103, and DR 2-104 as they existed prior to the 1992 repeal and reenactment of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Relevant cases construing DR 2-101 have been included under Rule 7.1, cases construing DR 2-103 have been included under Rule 1.5, and cases construing DR 2-104 have been included under Rule 1.16.