Rule 7.2.Advertising
(a)A lawyer may advertise a lawyer's services or fees through any
public media, such as a telephone directory, legal directory, newspaper or
other periodical, outdoor advertising, radio or television, electronic media
or
through written or recorded communication including those governed by Rule
7.3, to prospective clients, consumers or the public at large. Such
communications shall be referred to as "advertisements."
(b)A copy or recording of an advertisement shall be kept by the lawyer
for four years after its last dissemination along with a record of when and
where it was used.
(c)A lawyer shall not give anything of value to a person for recommending
the lawyer's services,
except that a lawyer may:
(1)Pay the reasonable costs of advertisements permitted by this rule;
(2)Pay the usual charges of a not-for-profit lawyer referral service or
legal service organization; and
(3)Pay for a law practice in accordance with Rule 1.17.
(d)Any advertisement made pursuant to this rule shall include the name
of at least one lawyer responsible for its content.
(e)All advertisements governed by this rule shall also comply with the
requirements of Rules 7.1 and 7.4.
|
ANNOTATIONSSource:
(c)(1), (2), and (3) amended and adopted June 12, 1997,
effective July 1, 1997;
entire rule and comment amended and adopted June 12, 1997,
effective January 1, 1998.
COMMENT
To assist the public in obtaining legal services, lawyers should be allowed
to make known their services not only through reputation but also through
organized information campaigns in the form of advertising. Advertising
involves an active quest for clients, contrary to the tradition that a lawyer
should not seek clientele. However, the public's need to know about legal
services can be fulfilled in part through advertising. This need is
particularly acute in the case of persons of moderate means who have not made
extensive use of legal services. The interest in expanding public information about legal
services ought to prevail over considerations of
tradition. Nevertheless, advertising by lawyers entails the risk of practices that are
misleading or overreaching.
Questions of effectiveness and taste in advertising are matters of
speculation and subjective judgment. Some jurisdictions have had extensive
prohibitions against television advertising, against advertising going beyond
specified facts about a lawyer, or against "undignified" advertising.
Television is now one of the most powerful media for getting information to
the
public, particularly persons of low and moderate income; prohibiting
television
advertising, therefore, would impede the flow of information about legal
services to many sectors of the public. Limiting the information that may
be advertised has a similar effect and assumes that the bar can accurately
forecast the kind of information that the public would regard as relevant.
Neither this Rule nor Rule 7.3 prohibits communications authorized by law,
such as notice to members of a class in class action litigation.
Record of Advertising
Paragraph (b) requires that a record of the content and use of advertising
be kept in order to facilitate enforcement of this Rule. It does not require
that advertising be subject to review prior to dissemination. Such a
requirement would be burdensome and expensive relative to its possible
benefits, and may be of doubtful constitutionality.
Paying Others to Recommend a Lawyer
A lawyer is allowed to pay for advertising permitted by the Rule, and for
the purchase of a law practice in accordance with the provisions of Rule
1.17, but
otherwise is not permitted to pay another person for channeling professional
work. This restriction does not prevent an organization or person
other than the lawyer from advertising or recommending the lawyer's services.
Thus, a legal aid agency or prepaid legal services plan may pay to advertise
legal services provided under its auspices. Likewise, a lawyer may
participate in not-for-profit lawyer referral programs and pay the usual fees
charged by such programs.
Paragraph (c) does not prohibit paying regular compensation to an assistant,
such as a secretary, to prepare communications permitted by this Rule.
Editor's note:
The only change to this comment as a result of the 1997 amendments are in the
last paragraph.
ANNOTATION
Annotator's note.
Rule 7.2 is similar to
DR 2-101, DR 2-102, and DR 2-103
as they
existed prior to the 1992 repeal and reenactment of the Code of
Professional Responsibility.
Relevant cases construing
DR 2-101 and DR 2-102 have been included in the annotations to Rule 7.1.
Cases construing DR 2-103 have been included under Rule 1.5.
Public censure was appropriate where attorney continued to advertise
with
an unapproved, for-profit attorney referral service and where attorney had
previously been disciplined with regard to use of client funds and was on
suspension at the time of censure. People v. Mason, 938 P.2d 133 (Colo.
1997).
|