Colorado Supreme Court
Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel
Promoting Professionalism. Protecting the Public.
Bargaining with
Complaints is Playing with Fire
Attempting to leverage a disciplinary
action can land you in hot water.
By MATTHEW SAMUELSON and JAMES
CARLSON
Fall
2013
When attempting
to steer clear of a disciplinary complaint, attorneys must be mindful of
violations that involve the mention
of a disciplinary complaint. Confused? Read on.
There are two
questions about this issue. One, where’s the line between notifying an attorney
of a possible violation of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct and
threatening an attorney with a complaint to gain an advantage in a legal
matter? Two, can you include in a settlement agreement a condition that the
other party withdraw a disciplinary complaint?
The rules
surrounding this issue are meant to ensure that civil cases are resolved on
their merits and not on improper considerations. A comment under Colorado Rule
of Professional Conduct 4.5 states that when ulterior motives enter the
equation it “tend(s) to diminish public confidence in our legal system.”
Let’s tackle the
above questions individually.
A Fine Line
Colorado Rule of
Professional Conduct 4.5(a) states, “A lawyer shall not threaten criminal,
administrative or disciplinary charges to obtain an advantage in a civil matter
nor shall a lawyer present or participate in presenting criminal,
administrative or disciplinary charges solely to obtain an advantage in a civil
matter.”
However, Rule 4.5(b)
goes on to say that it’s not a violation for a lawyer to simply notify another
attorney of a potential violation. What does that distinction look like in the
real world? Here are some tips:
·
If
there is any hint of a quid pro quo,
you run the risk of violating 4.5(a). Statements like “If you do this, then
I’ll do that” probably implicate the rule.
·
If
you’re unsure of whether another attorney’s action constitutes a violation,
send a letter to the other attorney asking for clarification
of his or her actions. Doing so exhausts your administrative remedies and gives
a fellow professional the benefit of the doubt. It also ensures you have all
the facts before proceeding. To ensure that the letter is not construed as a
threat, it’s best to not mention the disciplinary system at all.
·
With
regard to putting another lawyer on notice, ask yourself the following
questions: “Do I intend to gain something by doing this?” “Does the other
lawyer want my opinion?” “Why am I doing this?” If these or similar questions
do not reveal good answers, you may not want to send the letter.
Conditional Withdrawal
Another issue to
be aware of is that you cannot condition a settlement of any kind on the other
party’s agreement to withdraw a disciplinary complaint. In past cases, the
Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel has considered these agreements, and
offers to make them, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in
violation of Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(d).
Similarly,
Colorado Bar Association Formal Ethics Opinion 85 states that it is “improper
for a lawyer to require a client to refrain from filing or to withdraw a
grievance against the lawyer, or to refuse to cooperate with the disciplinary
proceedings, as a condition of settlement of a malpractice claim.”
Broad confidentiality
clauses that are intended to prohibit a party from revealing information to
disciplinary authorities also may violate this rule. The attorney discipline
system serves vital purposes distinct from those of the civil justice system
and the interests of private parties involved in a civil matter.
A wise
practitioner with concerns about either of these issues should refer to the
Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct or consult with an attorney who
specializes in Colorado disciplinary cases.
Matthew
Samuelson is Chief Deputy Regulation Counsel for the Office of Attorney
Regulation Counsel.
James
Carlson is the Information Resources Coordinator for the Office of Attorney
Regulation Counsel. If you have an idea for the OARC Update, contact him at j.carlson@csc.state.co.us.
Portions of this article were contributed
by a member of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee.